Miroslav Volf talks about American Exceptionalism

When Miroslav Volf talks about America, I’m inclined to listen. I think he has done as much as anyone in reminding me that America isn’t innocent. A belief in American exceptionalism is one of the more insidious requirements our society makes of those who are running for office and attempting to lead, if not of the ordinary citizen. Volf is refreshing because he reminds us that goodness and innocence are not the same thing. We can love and appreciate the social vision and experiment that is the American republic. However, the innocence combined with immense power is a dangerous mixture. It takes a man like Volf to teach us this.

I have really come to love Volf and his work over the past few years. Not only is he quite brilliant as a theological thinker, but his personal story is so rich and moving. He was born in Croatia and lived in Serbia under the communist regime. His brother was killed by a careless soldier who his parents chose to forgive instead of prosecute. His father was a Pentecostal pastor who was tortured in a concentration camp. Miroslav was forced to do 2 years of military service during which he was imprisoned and interrogated, accused of being a spy and threatened with prison and death.

Yet, Volf writes and speaks mostly about hope. He studied under Jurgen Moltmann, which seems so fitting given Moltmann’s experience under Hitler’s regime and the fact that Moltmann’s brother, who was mentally handicapped, was euthanized by the SS. I hope you’ll listen to Volf as he talks about our society here:


What is the Chief Political Concern of the Bible? Eleven of the world's leading theologians weigh in...

Bible
Below is the most recent article I wrote for the Huffington Post. I hope you'll take moment to read it. If you are willing to help me out a little bit, the best way to support the article is the 1) share it on your facebook wall via the Huffington Post page itself. Just go the article, click the Facebook "share" icon & post it to your page. 2) click the "like" button. 3) Email it or tweet to your friends via the HuffPo page as well. The use of all of those widgets is tracked and the more traffic it creates, the more prominently the article will appear - which means more people will read it. Thanks for supporting me!


Both religion and politics are concerned with how we should organize societies. Yet the tendency for Christians has often been to begin with the politics and work backwards to find religious rationale for our political beliefs. As a result, most people read the Bible not to challenge our deeply held beliefs, but to affirm the decisions we've already made with our lives.
If you tend toward the political right you might say the chief political concern of the Scriptures has as much to do with smaller government, lower taxes, individual freedoms and gun rights as any explicit Christian concept. If you tend toward the political left you might believe the chief political concern of the Scriptures has more to do with reproductive rights, religious pluralism, big government and labor unions. Too often the ideologies of the secular right or the political left have been allowed set the terms for religious Christians. Secular political ideologies on both sides of the spectrum have provided the primary vision for American Christian political involvement, while the chief political concerns of the Scripture have been muted, distorted and curbed to fit the designs of those in power.
What if we were to reverse the flow? What if we would begin with the Scriptures and work our way forward to the politics? What does the Bible tell us about how we are supposed to organize our common life together so that we can actually bear the image of God to all creation?
I put this question to some of the world's foremost theological minds. The following respondents are all heavyweights who live and work at the top of their fields in biblical studies, theology and Christian ethics. Perhaps their words will help us all to begin our political discourse with these sorts of ideas as our first assumptions.
I asked each expert to respond briefly to one question: "What is the chief political concern of the Bible?"
N.T. Wright, New Testament Scholar at University of St. Andrews
"The chief political concern of the Scriptures is for God's wise and loving ordering of his world to be operative through humans who will share his priorities, especially his concern for the poor, the weak and the vulnerable. This concern was embodied by Jesus in his inauguration of 'God's kingdom' through his public career and especially his self-giving death, which together set the pattern for a radically redefined notion of power."
William Cavanaugh, Theologian specializing in Political theology at DePaul
"Jesus' chief political concern was clearly for more tax cuts for the rich. 'My yoke is easy, and my burden is light' is an obvious reference to cutting or eliminating capital gains taxes. This is the only way of explaining why hedge fund managers were so close to his heart."
John Milbank, Theologian specializing in Politics and ethics at the University of Nottingham
"It is identical with the main concern of the Scriptures as such: the restoration of the glory of God through the repair and fulfillment, and so harmonization of the cosmos, including, centrally, the human order."
Stanley Hauerwas, Theologian and ethicist at Duke Divinity School
"The chief political concern of the Bible is to worship God truly."
Brent Strawn, Old Testament Scholar, Candler School of Theology at Emory University
"The chief political concern of the Bible is the restoration of God's shalom on the entire world: human and nonhuman, animate or inanimate. That encompasses all aspects of the human polis and thus politics but also the entirety of creation so that nothing is left outside this primal 'political' concern."

Walter Brueggemann, Old Testament Scholar, Columbia Theological Seminary
"I believe that the central political question is the management of public power in order that there should be an economically viable life for all members of the community. Thus justice is front and center and some texts, especially in Deuteronomy, are for the distribution of wealth in order that all may be viable. Obviously such justice is marked by mercy, compassion and generosity. The purpose is to create a genuine neighborhood for all the neighbors."
James K.A. Smith, Professor of Philosophy and Congregational ministry, Calvin College
"Shalom -- the well-ordered flourishing that God desires for all of creation, and that brings God glory."
Ellen T. Charry, Professor of Historical and Systematic Theology, Princeton Theological Seminary
"I am persuaded that the chief political concern of the Older Testament is the cultivation of healthy societies, that is communities that adhere to divine guidance. The chief political concern of the Younger Testament is the revisioning of community in order better to meet the goal of stated above."
Miroslav Volf, Systematic Theology, Yale Divinity School
"The vision of the city of God is the goal. We work for it not by forcing it down from heaven to earth, but by treading in the footsteps of the crucified and resurrected Christ."
Brian McLaren, Author and theologian
"God's solidarity with the poor, oppressed, outcast and forgotten."
Sarah Coakley, Professor of Divinity, Cambridge University
"The reign of God is of much more consistent concern than justice (pace Wolterstorff). This is of course construing 'political' broadly."

Monday Morning Confessional


Enneagram Three
I confess that my wife was gone for most of the weekend & I had the boys all by myself. I confess that we all made it through w/out a scratch and with a rekindled respect and appreciation for mom. I confess that if “marrying up” is a real thing, I did.

I confess that I’m headed to Conception Abbey to pray with the monks, see Fr. Adam, and spend time w/my AMO fellows, so I may not be a very faithful blogger this week, but I will be a better person next week.

I confess that last week I interacted via email with some of my theological heroes around a story I'm writing for The Huffington Post. I confess that this was an amazing thing, even if it really had nothing to do with them caring anything about who I am or what I’m doing, and if you asked them who Tim Suttle is, most of them wouldn’t even remember my name. Nevertheless, I got an email from N.T. Wright, Walter Brueggemann, John Milbank, William Cavanaugh, Stanley Hauerwas, Brent Strawn, Jamie Smith, Ellen Charry, Miroslav Volf, Brian McLaren, and Sarah Coakley last week. If I was a “woot” person, now would be the time. But I'm not.

I confess that I am terrified of failure.

I confess that I’m a #3 on the Enneagram – pretty sure anyway – which means that my basic desire is to feel valuable & worthwhile. In my journey, I have filled this constant need to be valuable & worthwhile by accomplishing everything I can. To fail at something strikes a blow to my (false) self-worth. As a #3 (and a broken person), I have spent most of my life worrying that I’ll never amount to anything. This means that the hardest part of my discipleship will always be to simply accept the unconditional love of God. I confess that I’m struggling to accept and live in the unconditional love of God today – and I’m so thankful that God’s love is something I can count on, even when I would rather try it my way.

I confess that I actually watch & enjoy The New Girl… is that a guilty pleasure or just wrong?

I confess that I feel like I live a whole parallel life within my own head. I have a constant conversation happening in my own mind which is focused chiefly on epistemology & ontology. Who is this God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob? How has this God been revealed to us? How does it all work – this life, this redemption – and especially what part am I (and are we), meant to play? How can I think and live and act and be faithful to God? It never stops… ever. I confess that I wish that I could make it stop sometimes. It’s so exhausting.

I made my confession - now make yours!

Bethge's Ginormous Biography of Bonhoeffer: On "Making oneself sure of something"

Okay, I finally pulled the trigger and spent my $150 Amazon.com gift card. The first purchase was Bethge's biography of Dietrich Bonhoeffer. I have to say, upon opening the package, I feel the need to retract my earlier griping about the book's cost. I had no idea it was over 1000 pages long. It's like buying two books and the price now seems appropriate. I'm obviously glad to have the book in hand... 45 pages in and am already completely enthralled.

Bethge was explaining what he thought DB's reasons were for studying theology in the first place. Bethge believed that DB would have never wanted to come to a full conclusion on the matter because he "sensed that the curiosity to make oneself sure of something was self-destructive. So we must accept a certain amount of uncertainty..." I've been quite struck by this phrase and the recognition of the danger of "making oneself sure of something."

One of my favorite quotes of all time was given by David Burrell when he was speaking at NTS years ago. He said, "There are two kinds of people in the world: people who need certitude, and those who search for truth." I think he's onto the same thing as Bonhoeffer. Both are insisting  not upon some radical postmodern incredulity toward the existence of absolute truth, but upon the kind of self-deception which always accompanies certitude.

Certitude is deadly.

  • First, it severely limits the ability to grow because certitude refuses to entertain the idea that it could be wrong. Why continue to search for the truth when we've already arrived? 
  • Second, it creates a posture of defensiveness. Any challenge to certitude must be met with resistance, even violence - I see this in people like John Piper and other self-proclaimed protectors of "orthodoxy." Certitude requires us to expend an inordinate amount of energy defending our version of reality.
  • Third, it follows from the first two reasons certitude is deadly, that our certitude actually adversely impacts the spiritual journey of other seekers. When we traffic in certitudes, requiring others to do the same, attacking those who do not, then we limit the ability of those who are still in progress to continue their journey unabated. In undermines our confidence that the Holy Spirit is at work in the lives of everyone who seeks after God. Certitude erases the space people require in order to work things out for themselves in community with us.
Doubt, or perhaps uncertainty is not the opposite of faith, certitude is. Faith requires that which we put our faith in to remain - at least to some extent - unseen, unknown, or obscured. Because we see as through a glass dimly, we know that our means of comprehending the divine are somehow compromised. Thus our ability to cut through paradox and the inherent contradictions of our lives will never be solved on this side of eternity. The pursuit of truth is the pursuit of God. The pursuit of God requires a certain amount of humility with regard to our ability to be certain. Bonhoeffer is right, there is a danger in making oneself sure of something. We see the truth not so that we can somehow exhaustively explain it. We seek the truth so that we will be transformed by the journey such a quest requires.

Why the Ascension Matters: A few thoughts for Ascension Day


Today is Ascension Day, or as most evangelicals call it, "Thursday." Do we not know what the ascension really means because we don't celebrate it? Or do we not celebrate it because we don't know what it means? Either way, I've been sitting on a nice post by Mark Cortez, who is a professor at Western Seminary. I don't know much about Dr. Cortez or Western, but I really like what he has to say about why the ascension is critical to our understanding of the story of God, especially the part we play in it right now. Here are his 5 reasons:

"1. The Kingdom: It’s really with the ascension that Jesus establishes the Kingdom. Although Jesus lived his entire life in fulfillment of God’s Kingdom promises, the ascension is key. That’s why the Bible pictures the Ascension as Jesus going up into heaven leading a host of captives (Eph. 4:8), the defeated enemies of the Kingdom. And, arriving in heaven, he sits down at the Father’s right hand (Ps. 110:1; Heb 1:3). His rule has begun. The Kingdom is here! With his birth the King arrives. With his life, death, and resurrection the King redeems. With his ascension the King rules. If you stop short of the ascension, the story dies.
 2. The Priest: And, having returned to the father, Jesus also serves forever as our true High Priest (Heb. 9), the perfect priest who cleansed the people from their sins and will always represent them before the Father. The ascension breaks the cycle of God’s people continually needing a new priest to offer a new sacrifice. With the ascension, Jesus becomes our true priest forever.
 3. The Spirit: In one of the most amazing statements in the Bible, Jesus says that “it is to your advantage that I go away” (Jn. 16:5). I can think of several people who could make the world a better place just by leaving it. But Jesus? How can his departure be good for us? Because the ascension is when Jesus sends the Spirit to God’s people. His departure is good news because the Spirit is good news. So, having promised to send the Spirit once he was gone, that’s exactly what he did. After Acts 1 comes Acts 2 – Jesus ascended and the Spirit came. Good news.
 4. The People: But now for an interesting question: Why did Jesus need to leave in order to send the Spirit? Couldn’t the Spirit have come while he was here? To be honest, I have no idea if God could have done things differently. Probably. So why do it like this? As I’ve said before, I try to avoid answering “Why did God…?” questions. But I do wonder if Jesus ascended and sent the Spirit to empower God’s people so that we could do what we were always supposed to: image God in creation as his people. Jesus could have continued doing that for us. He does it far better than we ever could. But God’s plan was never to carry out our role for us. He wants us to do it. So I wonder if the ascension is about God creating space for his people to be his people and carry out their calling in the world. I don’t know, but I wonder.
 5. The Future: Finally, I think the ascension is a powerful reminder of our destiny. Here it’s important to remember that Jesus did not stop being human when he ascended. It’s not as though his humanity was a costume that he put on at Christmas and hastily discarded at the ascension. Jesus represents us as our High Priest forever specifically because he remains one of us forever. So the ascension points to our destiny as humans – ruling over God’s creation and manifesting his glory everywhere.

The ascension is not an optional add-on to the story, a piece that we may choose to discuss if we have any time after dealing with the more important parts. The ascension is critical. The ascension is when the King rules, the Priest represents, the Spirit comes, the People serve, and the future shines with the brilliance of God’s plan. Jesus didn’t just ride off into the sunset, leaving us to clean up the mess he left behind. Jesus ascended to the right hand of the father so that God’s plans could be accomplished. Once we really understand that, we’ll agree that it truly was better for us that he go."

Best Marriage Quote Ever: Alexander Schmemann on Marriage as Mission


As a follow up to the conversation begun yesterday about Christian marriage, I wanted to share the best marriage quote I've ever read, at least in relation to the modern institution of marriage. Schmeman was an Eastern Orthodox priest, writer, and theologian. His book For the Life of the World is a must-read.

“A marriage which does not constantly crucify its own selfishness and self-sufficiency, which does not “die to itself” that it may point beyond itself, is not a Christian marriage. The real sin of marriage today is not adultery or lack of “adjustment” or “mental cruelty.” It is the idolization of the family itself, the refusal to understand marriage as directed toward the Kingdom of God. This is expressed in the sentiment that one would “do anything” for his family, even steal. The family has here ceased to be for the glory of God; it has ceased to be a sacramental entrance into his presence. It is not the lack of respect for the family, it is the idolization of the family that breaks the modern family so easily, making divorce its almost natural shadow. It is the identification of marriage with happiness and the refusal to accept the cross in it. In a Christian marriage, in fact, three are married; and the united loyalty of the two toward the third, who is God, keeps the two in an active unity with each other as well as with God. Yet it is the presence of God which is the death of the marriage as something only “natural.” It is the cross of Christ that brings the self-sufficiency of nature to its end. But “by the cross, joy entered the whole world.” Its presence is thus the real joy of marriage. It is the joyful certitude that the marriage vow, in the perspective of the eternal Kingdom, is not taken “until death parts,” but until death unites us completely.” – Alexander Schmemann, For the Life of the World

Schmemann is rightly claiming that marriage is unintelligible not only outside of the church, but more importantly outside the mission of God. The mission of God is what gives marriage a proper sense of itself. He's exposing one of the realities of our current culture on marriage: Most people think of their own marriage as something that exists “for my spouse and I, so that we might be happy and have our needs fulfilled.” Schmemann unequivocally says this is idolatry. It is allowing the marriage to turn in on itself – we look to our marriage to meet our needs and it will always fail and thus so many marriages end in divorce. 

Christian marriage does not exist for the benefit of the two people in the marriage, it is for the benefit of the world, that God would be glorified. The main purpose of marriage is not the enjoyment of the two people who are married, the main purpose of marriage is to glorify Christ as we participate in the Mission of God. Anything less is making an idol out of marriage.

New Marriage Stats - Marriage is on the Wane


Here are some new stats on marriage from the Black, White, & Gray blog. Interesting trends happening right now. Divorce rate seems to be going down in our society - if only slightly. Overall marriages are down as well, which means the drop in divorce rate is due to the fact that more people who would enter "risky" marriages are now less like to marry. Kudos to Iowa for being the best state in the union for sticking with a marriage.

The bloggers seem to be down on the destination wedding. I'm down on people who never go to church getting a church wedding... Vegas anyone?

What do you think about destination weddings?

Do you think people who are irreligious should have a church wedding?